Re: X, Motif - what's the lowerest for a gui?
From: Noah Roberts (nroberts_at_dontemailme.com)
Date: 05/05/04
- Previous message: Kasper Dupont: "Re: Checking the value of recv()"
- In reply to: Otto Wyss: "Re: X, Motif - what's the lowerest for a gui?"
- Next in thread: Otto Wyss: "Re: X, Motif - what's the lowerest for a gui?"
- Reply: Otto Wyss: "Re: X, Motif - what's the lowerest for a gui?"
- Reply: Jan Panteltje: "Re: X, Motif - what's the lowerest for a gui?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 04 May 2004 21:46:28 -0700
Otto Wyss wrote:
> Gernot Frisch <Me@Privacy.net> wrote:
>
>
>>Hi,
>>
>>I want to make a simple GUI program that requires the least possible
>>dependencies. I think X11 is the way to go, but it doesn't have "text
>
>
> Why do you need the least possible dependences? Any Linux distribution
> has everything you need for this.
>
>
>>boxes", buttons and menues AFAIK.
>>Also Motif should be something very low. Can you tell me what's on
>>99.9% of all Linux installations and which provides the named 3
>>widgets?
>
>
> Just use a framework like GTK+, QT, wxWidgets ... and you get everything
> you need.
I don't know that I would choose wxWindows unless you need windows
compatability. Might turn some people away that don't like to install
various libraries they don't need for a single program. wxWindows may
come with the distro, but I never install it and there are probably many
like me.
-- "I'm a war president. I make decisions here in the Oval Office in foreign policy matters with war on my mind." - Bush
- Previous message: Kasper Dupont: "Re: Checking the value of recv()"
- In reply to: Otto Wyss: "Re: X, Motif - what's the lowerest for a gui?"
- Next in thread: Otto Wyss: "Re: X, Motif - what's the lowerest for a gui?"
- Reply: Otto Wyss: "Re: X, Motif - what's the lowerest for a gui?"
- Reply: Jan Panteltje: "Re: X, Motif - what's the lowerest for a gui?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]