Re: X, Motif - what's the lowerest for a gui?
From: Otto Wyss (otto.wyss_at_orpatec.ch)
Date: 05/05/04
- Next message: Jan Panteltje: "Re: X, Motif - what's the lowerest for a gui?"
- Previous message: Graham Nicholls: "Network Monitoring System"
- In reply to: Noah Roberts: "Re: X, Motif - what's the lowerest for a gui?"
- Next in thread: Jan Panteltje: "Re: X, Motif - what's the lowerest for a gui?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 5 May 2004 17:50:13 +0200
Noah Roberts <nroberts@dontemailme.com> wrote:
> Otto Wyss wrote:
> > Just use a framework like GTK+, QT, wxWidgets ... and you get everything
> > you need.
>
> I don't know that I would choose wxWindows unless you need windows
> compatability. Might turn some people away that don't like to install
> various libraries they don't need for a single program. wxWindows may
> come with the distro, but I never install it and there are probably many
> like me.
Why do you think that? What kind of compatibility do you mean? You
probably mean better suited for Window programming than the other
frameworks.
IMO wxWidgets is better suited for programming on any platform. Since I
switched from GTK+ to wxWidgets I got the impression I've build the
better applications than before.
If you want do see how easy wxWidgets can be used have look at wxGuide
("http://freshmeat.net/projects/wxguide/").
O. Wyss
-- See a huge pile of work at "http://wyodesktop.sourceforge.net/"
- Next message: Jan Panteltje: "Re: X, Motif - what's the lowerest for a gui?"
- Previous message: Graham Nicholls: "Network Monitoring System"
- In reply to: Noah Roberts: "Re: X, Motif - what's the lowerest for a gui?"
- Next in thread: Jan Panteltje: "Re: X, Motif - what's the lowerest for a gui?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
