Re: Kernel header files in applications and GPL issues
From: Kasper Dupont (abuse_at_wfbtxutyalwrmianeanaimlqcc.skrammel.yaboo.dk)
Date: 06/15/04
- Next message: Kasper Dupont: "Re: Sending e-mail from application"
- Previous message: enrique: "LPRng printing issue"
- In reply to: Byron A Jeff: "Re: Kernel header files in applications and GPL issues"
- Next in thread: Floyd L. Davidson: "Re: Kernel header files in applications and GPL issues"
- Reply: Floyd L. Davidson: "Re: Kernel header files in applications and GPL issues"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 08:15:23 +0200
Byron A Jeff wrote:
>
> The FSF takes this stance: if it is not possible for the application to
> function without that GPL library, then the application is a derivative of
> the library. However if there is another library that isn't GPL with the
> same interface specification such that the application can function on that
> second library, the application isn't a derivative even if it functions with
> the GPL library.
I know they say that. But I have no reason to believe it is true.
-- Kasper Dupont -- der bruger for meget tid paa usenet. For sending spam use kasperd@kd.lir.dk and abuse@kd.lir.dk I'd rather be a hammer than a nail.
- Next message: Kasper Dupont: "Re: Sending e-mail from application"
- Previous message: enrique: "LPRng printing issue"
- In reply to: Byron A Jeff: "Re: Kernel header files in applications and GPL issues"
- Next in thread: Floyd L. Davidson: "Re: Kernel header files in applications and GPL issues"
- Reply: Floyd L. Davidson: "Re: Kernel header files in applications and GPL issues"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
Loading