Re: Open source alternative for MsAccess?
From: Steve Jorgensen (nospam_at_nospam.nospam)
Date: 06/16/04
- Next message: Tim: "Re: new to programming in Linux"
- Previous message: David W. Fenton: "Re: Open source alternative for MsAccess?"
- In reply to: David W. Fenton: "Re: Open source alternative for MsAccess?"
- Next in thread: Bernard Peek: "Re: Open source alternative for MsAccess?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2004 04:59:28 GMT
On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 22:10:41 GMT, "David W. Fenton"
<dXXXfenton@bway.net.invalid> wrote:
>Steve Jorgensen <nospam@nospam.nospam> wrote in
>news:tm7uc0l8dvt31va2s1e267h5ssarj4bens@4ax.com:
>
>> There is no excuse to ever write code without
>> Option Explicit, and it's the default setting to not have it.
>
>Wasn't this changed back in A2K2 or A2K3 to default to having it on?
>
>Or was that just including the DAO reference along with the useless
>ADO reference?
The latter. You still have to turn on Require Variable declaration once on
each system, though the setting is remembered at the application level.
- Next message: Tim: "Re: new to programming in Linux"
- Previous message: David W. Fenton: "Re: Open source alternative for MsAccess?"
- In reply to: David W. Fenton: "Re: Open source alternative for MsAccess?"
- Next in thread: Bernard Peek: "Re: Open source alternative for MsAccess?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]