Re: Array pointers
From: Erik Max Francis (max_at_alcyone.com)
Date: 08/16/04
- Next message: Joe Beanfish: "Re: Embedded SMTP Problems"
- Previous message: Kasper Dupont: "Re: Simulating network traffic"
- In reply to: Jens.Toerring_at_physik.fu-berlin.de: "Re: Array pointers"
- Next in thread: Jens.Toerring_at_physik.fu-berlin.de: "Re: Array pointers"
- Reply: Jens.Toerring_at_physik.fu-berlin.de: "Re: Array pointers"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 09:57:22 -0700
Jens.Toerring@physik.fu-berlin.de wrote:
> A two-dimensional array like your
>
> int array[2][3];
>
> doesn't decay to a pointer to pointer to int but just a pointer to
> int.
No, it decays to an int *[3].
> > and then when I run the binary, I get a segmentation fault.
>
> Yes, that was to be expected...
Your proposal would also fail.
-- __ Erik Max Francis && max@alcyone.com && http://www.alcyone.com/max/ / \ San Jose, CA, USA && 37 20 N 121 53 W && AIM erikmaxfrancis \__/ Divorces are made in Heaven. -- Oscar Wilde
- Next message: Joe Beanfish: "Re: Embedded SMTP Problems"
- Previous message: Kasper Dupont: "Re: Simulating network traffic"
- In reply to: Jens.Toerring_at_physik.fu-berlin.de: "Re: Array pointers"
- Next in thread: Jens.Toerring_at_physik.fu-berlin.de: "Re: Array pointers"
- Reply: Jens.Toerring_at_physik.fu-berlin.de: "Re: Array pointers"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|