Standards have to be respected.
From: Jeff Relf (Usenet_2__at_JeffRelf.Cotse.NET)
Date: 09/14/04
- Next message: Jeff Relf: "There are drivers, then there are Drivers ."
- Previous message: Jeff Relf: "Re: Real " handy "."
- In reply to: Richard Steiner: "Re: Bull*** !"
- Next in thread: John Bailo: "Stateless..."
- Reply: John Bailo: "Stateless..."
- Reply: Richard Steiner: "Re: Standards have to be respected."
- Reply: Rick: "Re: Standards have to be respected."
- Reply: Rex Ballard: "Re: Standards have to be respected."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 14 Sep 2004 13:46:38 GMT
Hi Richard Steiner,
You wrote: <<
If the device you want to use
doesn't currently work under Linux, then:
1. find out if someone else in the Linux community
has an interest in writing a driver for it
( or there's an existing project ),
2. ask the company who makes it to write a driver, or
3. write a driver yourself.
There are no other options, realistically... >>
That doesn't work when your program
has to work for any user out there...
automating Excel or employing any printer/pointing-device.
Standards have to be respected.
And Windows is the de facto standard,
it is the network, irregardless of the connection chosen.
- Next message: Jeff Relf: "There are drivers, then there are Drivers ."
- Previous message: Jeff Relf: "Re: Real " handy "."
- In reply to: Richard Steiner: "Re: Bull*** !"
- Next in thread: John Bailo: "Stateless..."
- Reply: John Bailo: "Stateless..."
- Reply: Richard Steiner: "Re: Standards have to be respected."
- Reply: Rick: "Re: Standards have to be respected."
- Reply: Rex Ballard: "Re: Standards have to be respected."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]