Re: Are Gnome and Abiword DEAD ?
From: A Nengineer (root_at_bondage.org)
Date: 10/24/04
- Next message: foamy: "Re: Are Gnome and Abiword DEAD ?"
- Previous message: Tomas Carnecky: "Re: [gentoo] change root partition when emerging packages"
- In reply to: Penang: "Are Gnome and Abiword DEAD ?"
- Next in thread: foamy: "Re: Are Gnome and Abiword DEAD ?"
- Reply: foamy: "Re: Are Gnome and Abiword DEAD ?"
- Reply: Abdullah Ramazanoglu: "Re: Are Gnome and Abiword DEAD ?"
- Reply: ray: "Re: Are Gnome and Abiword DEAD ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 16:35:06 GMT
Penang wrote:
> Let look at these pages ...
>
> http://developer.gnome.org/news/
>
> http://www.abisource.com/information/news/2004/awn203.phtml
>
> http://www.gimp.org/
>
> All have one thing in common - the last time they were updated was
> sometime June or July 2004.
>
> Are they DEAD ?!
Can anyone give a comparison with OO.org's word processor? Pros & Cons?
- Next message: foamy: "Re: Are Gnome and Abiword DEAD ?"
- Previous message: Tomas Carnecky: "Re: [gentoo] change root partition when emerging packages"
- In reply to: Penang: "Are Gnome and Abiword DEAD ?"
- Next in thread: foamy: "Re: Are Gnome and Abiword DEAD ?"
- Reply: foamy: "Re: Are Gnome and Abiword DEAD ?"
- Reply: Abdullah Ramazanoglu: "Re: Are Gnome and Abiword DEAD ?"
- Reply: ray: "Re: Are Gnome and Abiword DEAD ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|