Re: Are Gnome and Abiword DEAD ?
From: A Nengineer (root_at_bondage.org)
Date: 10/24/04
- Next message: Måns Rullgård: "Re: Are Gnome and Abiword DEAD ?"
- Previous message: foamy: "Re: Are Gnome and Abiword DEAD ?"
- In reply to: foamy: "Re: Are Gnome and Abiword DEAD ?"
- Next in thread: Måns Rullgård: "Re: Are Gnome and Abiword DEAD ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 16:46:32 GMT
foamy wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 16:35:06 +0000, A Nengineer wrote:
>
>
>>Penang wrote:
>>
>>>Let look at these pages ...
>>>
>>> http://developer.gnome.org/news/
>>>
>>> http://www.abisource.com/information/news/2004/awn203.phtml
>>>
>>> http://www.gimp.org/
>>>
>>>All have one thing in common - the last time they were updated was
>>>sometime June or July 2004.
>>>
>>>Are they DEAD ?!
>>
>>Can anyone give a comparison with OO.org's word processor? Pros & Cons?
>
>
> Slow.
> Sluggish.
> Bloated beyond belief.
> Does not translate Microsoft documents very well.
> See some recent threads in COLA concerning oo losing data.
> foamy
That wasn't a comparison, it was a simple display of FUD.
I repeat: Can anyone with a SERIOUS DISPOSITION compare OO.org and
Abiword for me?
- Next message: Måns Rullgård: "Re: Are Gnome and Abiword DEAD ?"
- Previous message: foamy: "Re: Are Gnome and Abiword DEAD ?"
- In reply to: foamy: "Re: Are Gnome and Abiword DEAD ?"
- Next in thread: Måns Rullgård: "Re: Are Gnome and Abiword DEAD ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
