Re: Abolute path of argv[0]
From: Chaz Ginger (cginboston_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 11/14/05
- Next message: Måns Rullgård: "Re: Abolute path of argv[0]"
- Previous message: Måns Rullgård: "Re: Abolute path of argv[0]"
- In reply to: Måns Rullgård: "Re: Abolute path of argv[0]"
- Next in thread: Chris F.A. Johnson: "Re: Abolute path of argv[0]"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 20:09:27 GMT
Is it possible to take this stuff offline? It does seem like it is
degenerating into a conversation that serves no real benefit for the group.
Chance
Måns Rullgård wrote:
> Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealmtje@yahoo.com> writes:
>
>
>>On a sunny day (Sun, 13 Nov 2005 18:56:38 +0000) it happened
>>=?iso-8859-1?q?M=E5ns_Rullg=E5rd?= <mru@inprovide.com> wrote in
>><yw1xbr0o8jh5.fsf@ford.inprovide.com>:
>>
>>
>>>Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealmtje@yahoo.com> writes:
>>>
>>>
>>>>On a sunny day (Sun, 13 Nov 2005 16:20:16 +0000) it happened
>>>>=?iso-8859-1?q?M=E5ns_Rullg=E5rd?= <mru@inprovide.com> wrote in
>>>
>>>You seem to consider yourself some sort of "power user", and yet you
>>>use a news reader so crummy that it doesn't understand MIME encoded
>>>headers. Strange...
>>
>>It is NOT a crummy reader, it understands the headers OK, as the replies
>>prove.
>
>
> I checked the source code (which is among most horrific I've seen) on
> your web site, and there is nothing in there that handles MIME encoded
> headers. You lose.
>
>
>>I just want [anybody] to see what idiot crap you used to post.
>
>
> I'm afraid you may have failed to achieve that goal.
>
>
>>>If, as you previously stated, you never make mistakes, why does your
>>>script bother checking the arguments?
>>
>>It was written for others, of your intelligencre, I just do
>
>
> I can't recall ever having posted results of an IQ test online, much
> less having sent them privately to you. I'm curios to know how you go
> about determining anything about my intelligence. Would you mind
> explaining it?
>
>
>>>These parameters changed from time to time. Keeping them inside the
>>>script seems like a bad idea. I'd use a configuration file instead,
>>>possibly automatically updated by some scanning program.
>>
>>Exactly not.
>>Fro mexpericne we knwo that it takes 48 seconds to add a satellite
>
>
> Does that include the time required to find out the correct
> parameters?
>
>
>>[to a text file], your scanning program will suck and suck for ages.
>
>
> I haven't written the program, so you can't know what it will or will
> not do.
>
>
>>>The usual mistakes.
>>
>>Idiot
>
>
> Yes, the kind of mistakes an idiot might make.
>
>
>>>I have a fair number of scripts and utilities. I just don't put them
>>>in .../sbin when they belong elsewhere.
>>
>>Dustbin?
>>
>>
>>>I think you have quite clearly demonstrated your lack of understanding
>>>of basic Unix concepts.
>>
>>WeAkLiNG non root computer victim.
>
>
> Ooooh, you can write using mixed case! IMPRESSIVE!! You must be a
> true master.
>
- Next message: Måns Rullgård: "Re: Abolute path of argv[0]"
- Previous message: Måns Rullgård: "Re: Abolute path of argv[0]"
- In reply to: Måns Rullgård: "Re: Abolute path of argv[0]"
- Next in thread: Chris F.A. Johnson: "Re: Abolute path of argv[0]"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
