Re: glibc 2.2 vs 2.3 issue back again
- From: John Reiser <jreiser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 16:21:27 -0800
> The glibc 2.2 vs 2.3 problem came back to haunt me [snip]
> Somebody mentioned in a previous thread (dynamic ELF - > static) that
> all one needs to do is lump together all the dynamic libs needed and use
> LD_LIBRARY_PATH. I know, Paul Pluzhnikov has questioned this and
> probably he is right because it fails for me.
[snip]
> Naively, I would have thought that if I copy all required glibc-2.3
> libraries and all glibc-2.3 version for all the executables (including
> ones executed by the executables themselves), things should be fine.
Gibc considers the PT_INTERP, /lib/ld-linux.so.2, to be an integral part
of glibc. There are mutual dependencies between ld-linux and glibc.
However, you can play by the complete rules, switching the _entire_
glibc package, including ld-linux, for one execve() [command-line process]:
http://BitWagon.com/rtldi/rtldi.html
--
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: glibc 2.2 vs 2.3 issue back again
- From: Denes Molnar
- Re: glibc 2.2 vs 2.3 issue back again
- References:
- glibc 2.2 vs 2.3 issue back again
- From: Denes Molnar
- glibc 2.2 vs 2.3 issue back again
- Prev by Date: Re: glibc 2.2 vs 2.3 issue back again
- Next by Date: Re: glibc 2.2 vs 2.3 issue back again
- Previous by thread: Re: glibc 2.2 vs 2.3 issue back again
- Next by thread: Re: glibc 2.2 vs 2.3 issue back again
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|