Re: glibc 2.2 vs 2.3 issue back again
- From: Paul Pluzhnikov <ppluzhnikov-nsp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 21:33:25 -0800
Roger Leigh <${rleigh}@invalid.whinlatter.ukfsn.org.invalid> writes:
> Well, Linux 2.6 + a recent glibc use NPTL threads, whereas 2.4 will
> only work with LinuxThreads
The last statement is definitely incorrect:
$ head -1 /etc/issue
Red Hat Linux release 9 (Shrike)
$ uname -r
2.4.20-8smp
$ ldd /bin/date | grep libc.so.6
libc.so.6 => /lib/tls/libc.so.6 (0x42000000)
$ /lib/tls/libc.so.6 | grep NPTL
NPTL 0.29 by Ulrich Drepper
Both RH-9 and RHEL-3 do in fact run with 2.4.x kernel and NPTL
threads.
Cheers,
--
In order to understand recursion you must first understand recursion.
Remove /-nsp/ for email.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: glibc 2.2 vs 2.3 issue back again
- From: Roger Leigh
- Re: glibc 2.2 vs 2.3 issue back again
- References:
- glibc 2.2 vs 2.3 issue back again
- From: Denes Molnar
- Re: glibc 2.2 vs 2.3 issue back again
- From: Roger Leigh
- glibc 2.2 vs 2.3 issue back again
- Prev by Date: Re: glibc 2.2 vs 2.3 issue back again
- Next by Date: Do I redirect stdout to opened socket?
- Previous by thread: Re: glibc 2.2 vs 2.3 issue back again
- Next by thread: Re: glibc 2.2 vs 2.3 issue back again
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|