Re: glibc 2.2 vs 2.3 issue back again
- From: Roger Leigh <${rleigh}@invalid.whinlatter.ukfsn.org.invalid>
- Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 15:47:14 +0000
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Paul Pluzhnikov <ppluzhnikov-nsp@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Roger Leigh <${rleigh}@invalid.whinlatter.ukfsn.org.invalid> writes:
>
>> Well, Linux 2.6 + a recent glibc use NPTL threads, whereas 2.4 will
>> only work with LinuxThreads
>
> The last statement is definitely incorrect:
>
> $ head -1 /etc/issue
> Red Hat Linux release 9 (Shrike)
> $ uname -r
> 2.4.20-8smp
> $ ldd /bin/date | grep libc.so.6
> libc.so.6 => /lib/tls/libc.so.6 (0x42000000)
> $ /lib/tls/libc.so.6 | grep NPTL
> NPTL 0.29 by Ulrich Drepper
>
> Both RH-9 and RHEL-3 do in fact run with 2.4.x kernel and NPTL
> threads.
That's not a kernel.org kernel is it? Is this a RedHat-specific
thing, or an addition to later 2.4 kernels?
- --
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
Debian GNU/Linux http://www.debian.org/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848. Please sign and encrypt your mail.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8+ <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>
iD8DBQFDtAUAVcFcaSW/uEgRAuXKAKDPTfLFqMB9TvVEZ/FgaPGDhrzDowCgvyuh
6Iudmu8Gn6Wa5DqTiRuaFhM=
=z1rC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: glibc 2.2 vs 2.3 issue back again
- From: Paul Pluzhnikov
- Re: glibc 2.2 vs 2.3 issue back again
- References:
- glibc 2.2 vs 2.3 issue back again
- From: Denes Molnar
- Re: glibc 2.2 vs 2.3 issue back again
- From: Roger Leigh
- Re: glibc 2.2 vs 2.3 issue back again
- From: Paul Pluzhnikov
- glibc 2.2 vs 2.3 issue back again
- Prev by Date: Logging error messages in a Daemon program
- Next by Date: Re: -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 where to put it in a make project ?
- Previous by thread: Re: glibc 2.2 vs 2.3 issue back again
- Next by thread: Re: glibc 2.2 vs 2.3 issue back again
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|