Re: glibc 2.2 vs 2.3 issue back again
- From: Paul Pluzhnikov <ppluzhnikov-nsp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 16:07:07 -0800
Roger Leigh <${rleigh}@invalid.whinlatter.ukfsn.org.invalid> writes:
>> Both RH-9 and RHEL-3 do in fact run with 2.4.x kernel and NPTL
>> threads.
>
> That's not a kernel.org kernel is it?
No.
> Is this a RedHat-specific
> thing, or an addition to later 2.4 kernels?
RedHat often "back-ports" kernel features required for newer glibc.
Cheers,
--
In order to understand recursion you must first understand recursion.
Remove /-nsp/ for email.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: glibc 2.2 vs 2.3 issue back again
- From: Denes Molnar
- Re: glibc 2.2 vs 2.3 issue back again
- References:
- glibc 2.2 vs 2.3 issue back again
- From: Denes Molnar
- Re: glibc 2.2 vs 2.3 issue back again
- From: Roger Leigh
- Re: glibc 2.2 vs 2.3 issue back again
- From: Paul Pluzhnikov
- Re: glibc 2.2 vs 2.3 issue back again
- From: Roger Leigh
- glibc 2.2 vs 2.3 issue back again
- Prev by Date: Re: GDB and Macros
- Next by Date: mixed compilation
- Previous by thread: Re: glibc 2.2 vs 2.3 issue back again
- Next by thread: Re: glibc 2.2 vs 2.3 issue back again
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|