Re: x.org dropped imake, now what is the best way to convert existing Imakefile so it can be used with automake et all?
- From: Russell Shaw <rjshawN_o@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 13:46:15 +1100
Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealmtje@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
All my X windows applications use imake (Imakefile and xmkmf). I have read somewhere that in the latest X release from X.org imake is no longer supported, and automake should be used. That would for require me to release versions for that. What is the shortest path to go from an imake file to a makefile or whatever (I dunno) that automake uses?
automake creates makefiles. It's got an unbelievably steep learning curve, but once you've climbed it, it's really easy to use.
It's only steep because the documentation is pretty crappily layed out, and there has been a lot of obsolete docs on the net.
And why do they create this incompatibility? Imake worked just fine (at least for me), and was very simple to use.
Nobody else used imake. What they've done is to remove an incompatibility.
Feels a bit like leaving tgz for rpm ... marketing move?
Ummm, no. tgz is just an archive, and fails to integrate with package managers. rpm and deb both are really package formats.
.
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: glibc 2.2 vs 2.3 issue back again
- Next by Date: Re: x.org dropped imake, now what is the best way to convert existing Imakefile so it can be used with automake et all?
- Previous by thread: Re: x.org dropped imake, now what is the best way to convert existing Imakefile so it can be used with automake et all?
- Next by thread: Re: x.org dropped imake, now what is the best way to convert existing Imakefile so it can be used with automake et all?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|