Re: glibc 2.2 vs 2.3 issue back again

From: kaukasoina512nemha4@xxxxxx (Petri Kaukasoina)
Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 10:11:02 +0000 (UTC)

Denes Molnar <molnar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>I also managed to free up some room on the hard disk and tried chroot. It
>appears quite a pain because of X. From the chroot "box" there seems to be
>no way to access /tmp/.X11-unix/X0 to communicate with the X server - and
>thus all X programs fail.

Does it not work if you make a hard link?
ln /tmp/.X11-unix/X0 /your/chroot/tmp/.X11-unix/X0
.

References:
- glibc 2.2 vs 2.3 issue back again
  - From: Denes Molnar
- Re: glibc 2.2 vs 2.3 issue back again
  - From: Roger Leigh
- Re: glibc 2.2 vs 2.3 issue back again
  - From: Paul Pluzhnikov
- Re: glibc 2.2 vs 2.3 issue back again
  - From: Denes Molnar

Prev by Date: Re: x.org dropped imake, now what is the best way to convert existing Imakefile so it can be used with automake et all?
Next by Date: libxml2 and CDATA
Previous by thread: Re: glibc 2.2 vs 2.3 issue back again
Next by thread: Re: glibc 2.2 vs 2.3 issue back again
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread