Re: Trolltech QT license question
- From: Måns Rullgård <mru@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 22:04:21 +0000
Harry George <harry.g.george@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
"stork" <stork@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
I'm a copyright owner, my wife is an artist and my best friend is a
patent attorney. Thus, I lean more towards stronger copyright
protections for owners and less towards "fair use". If you want to use
something, you should pay for it.
You are profoundly missing the point(s):
[...]
3. TrollTech provides QT under commercial and GPL licenses. That is
their choice. It is up to others to decide if they really want to
use a linked library under GPL. Personally I do not.
I came across a piece of funny reading:
http://business.timesonline.co.uk/article/0%2c%2c9075-2051196%2c00.html
--
Måns Rullgård
mru@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
.
- References:
- Trolltech QT license question
- From: barryc . ctr
- Re: Trolltech QT license question
- From: stork
- Re: Trolltech QT license question
- From: David Schwartz
- Re: Trolltech QT license question
- From: stork
- Re: Trolltech QT license question
- From: David Schwartz
- Re: Trolltech QT license question
- From: stork
- Re: Trolltech QT license question
- From: Måns Rullgård
- Re: Trolltech QT license question
- From: stork
- Re: Trolltech QT license question
- From: Måns Rullgård
- Re: Trolltech QT license question
- From: John Hasler
- Re: Trolltech QT license question
- From: Harry George
- Trolltech QT license question
- Prev by Date: Re: Dynamic loading of code that is not on a filesystem.
- Next by Date: Re: Dynamic loading of code that is not on a filesystem.
- Previous by thread: Re: Trolltech QT license question
- Next by thread: Re: Trolltech QT license question
- Index(es):