Re: Trolltech QT license question
- From: "David Schwartz" <davids@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 00:50:01 -0800
"stork" <stork@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1140811752.507667.308670@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Stork replied to:
That's is such total bullshit. If Trolltech is trying to capitalize on
the popularity of the GPL while refusing to honor its spirit, they are the
ones you are ripping people off
There's nothing about a person's marketing that conferrs upon you the
right to steal their stuff. You either like the product or you don't.
If you like the product, then why not enter into a contract in good
faith, that is, honor the license?
I'm not stealing it, they're giving it to me.
And what the hell is up with the "free software" community arguing that
taking the absolute minimum you need to interoperate isn't fair use even
when courts seem to think it is?
I'm not a member of the Free Software Community. I have several closed
source products for Windows and I'm willing to make open source
products for Linux, because I have a business model that I hope will
support it. I believe in private property and strong intellectual
property.
Me too.
DS
.
- References:
- Trolltech QT license question
- From: barryc . ctr
- Re: Trolltech QT license question
- From: stork
- Re: Trolltech QT license question
- From: David Schwartz
- Re: Trolltech QT license question
- From: stork
- Re: Trolltech QT license question
- From: David Schwartz
- Re: Trolltech QT license question
- From: stork
- Re: Trolltech QT license question
- From: Måns Rullgård
- Re: Trolltech QT license question
- From: stork
- Re: Trolltech QT license question
- From: David Schwartz
- Re: Trolltech QT license question
- From: stork
- Trolltech QT license question
- Prev by Date: Re: Trolltech QT license question
- Next by Date: Re: Trolltech QT license question
- Previous by thread: Re: Trolltech QT license question
- Next by thread: Re: Trolltech QT license question
- Index(es):