strange behaviour of gcc 4.0.2



Hi,
at least i was ready to attack some program which is to be done
since December. So i started typing some files and tried to compiler
them. And guess what, my compiler told me that he does not know
anything about cout/cin/cerr and all that stuff concerning
StreamIO. Is this correct and when yes, why? It seems part of
C++ standard lib.


Regards,
Michael.


P.S.: coded so far on WinNT

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: RAD vs. performance
    ... Thing if the compiler doesn't let you get away with this. ... command1 and command2 defined as before, and a lot of Common Lisp ... written compiler for a dynamic language isn't inherently slower than ... The difference is that, for static typing, you reject programs ...
    (comp.lang.misc)
  • Re: RAD vs. performance
    ... Thing if the compiler doesn't let you get away with this. ... command1 and command2 defined as before, and a lot of Common Lisp ... written compiler for a dynamic language isn't inherently slower than ... The difference is that, for static typing, you reject programs ...
    (comp.lang.misc)
  • Re: PEP 3107 and stronger typing (note: probably a newbie question)
    ... You can have declarative static typing with very few type *checking* - I may be wrong here but I think one could even write a C compiler without *any* type checking. ... some dynamically typed languages have grown type-annotations for the very same reason: hinting the compiler about possible optimizations. ... Most of the errors I have to deal with are logical errors, not type errors, and given the kind of "logic" you can find in business applications, I have some doubt about what a static type system - even a _very_ smart one - could prove here, at least if we hope to deliver the application within time and budget constraints. ...
    (comp.lang.python)
  • Re: static, dynamic and implicitely typed languages
    ... You can also explicitly declare the types of variables, ... The compiler obviously knows that the function must return a list, ... It had no static typing at all ... compile time) (you can emulate implicit typing by casting around the ...
    (comp.lang.lisp)
  • Re: Obstacles for Tcl/Tk commercial application development ?
    ... The "error" is at a level that no compiler can catch. ... typing doesn't mean you have no type-induced errors in your code. ... language that uses strong static typing. ... On static type systems, this is no problem: ...
    (comp.lang.tcl)