Re: strange behaviour of gcc 4.0.2
- From: Michael Rasmussen <mir@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 14:07:25 +0100
On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 13:15:50 +0100, Bjoern Schliessmann wrote:
Maybe even smarter: Use cc for C and c++ for C++. Any *nix substitute cc
Did you forget "#include <iostream>"? Did you use "gcc" instead of "g++"
to for compiling (happened to me once ;) )?
and c++ for the systems standard C and standard C++ compiler. This is
especially a good idea in makefiles.
--
Hilsen/Regards
Michael Rasmussen
http://keyserver.veridis.com:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xE3E80917
.
- References:
- strange behaviour of gcc 4.0.2
- From: Michael . Ruehling
- strange behaviour of gcc 4.0.2
- Prev by Date: Re: strange behaviour of gcc 4.0.2
- Next by Date: Re: strange behaviour of gcc 4.0.2
- Previous by thread: Re: strange behaviour of gcc 4.0.2
- Next by thread: Re: strange behaviour of gcc 4.0.2
- Index(es):