Re: Is stork a troll? (was Re: Trolltech QT license question)



On 2006-03-08, stork <stork@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Stork replied to:

Thought experiment: If you have the [uncopyrightable] link tables and
function prototypes in hand,
I FALSIFIED THE ORIGINAL TEXT TO SAY "copyrightable" KEKEKEKE

Attribute my text and do not edit it.

What makes them copyrightable? I'm not talking about macros and inline
functions in the header, just the FACT that there is a function called
"foo" which takes some parameters and returns some type, or for the link
table, the fact that a symbol exists by the name "foo" at all. No more
copyrightable than a phone book.
.