Re: Is stork a troll? (was Re: Trolltech QT license question)

On 2006-03-10, stork <tbandrow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Attribute my text and do not edit it.

You posted something and it was wrong, used it as a premise, so I
corrected it. Basically, you were doing the A implies B to wage your
argument, and I attacked A.

What makes them copyrightable? I'm not talking about macros and inline
functions in the header, just the FACT that there is a function

uh, templates?

Not relevant to C.

[And it's still a mechanical transformation, which makes it not a
derivative work. However, it may be a compilation work in that case]
.