Re: no route to host
- From: davids@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: 22 Jul 2006 18:38:25 -0700
jasen wrote:
the error is "no route to host" (as I said above) according to perror(in the
pesudocode) I think that means ENETUNREACH
as far as connect(). (socket() and gethostbyname() work ...)
If you are saying that 'connect' returns 'no route to host', do you
call 'bind' on the socket?
Is this a freshly-allocated socket (from 'socket') or are you trying to
re-use the old socket?
DS
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: no route to host
- From: jasen
- Re: no route to host
- References:
- no route to host
- From: jasen
- Re: no route to host
- From: davids
- Re: no route to host
- From: jasen
- no route to host
- Prev by Date: Re: VPATH and -lNAME dependency in Makefile
- Next by Date: Target in Makefile.am to make a completly static version
- Previous by thread: Re: no route to host
- Next by thread: Re: no route to host
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|