Re: no route to host
- From: jasen <jasen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2006 21:19:28 -0000
On 2006-07-22, davids@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <davids@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
jasen wrote:
I notice the same behavior with ping (netkit) , once it's done
"no route to host" once it'll never work again. again, restarting
it or starting a new instance will work once the route is restored.
You are giving us no information that we could use to help you. You are
talking about a problem in a program you wrote and all you tell us it
that it won't work until you restart it. But what does "won't work"
mean?
the error is "no route to host" (as I said above) according to perror(in the
pesudocode) I think that means ENETUNREACH
Does a particular function give you an error return? If so, what
function and what error? Where does it first go wrong?
How far does it get?
as far as connect(). (socket() and gethostbyname() work ...)
Bye.
Jasen
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: no route to host
- From: davids
- Re: no route to host
- References:
- no route to host
- From: jasen
- Re: no route to host
- From: davids
- no route to host
- Prev by Date: Re: Verifying "Real" serial ports
- Next by Date: Re: VPATH and -lNAME dependency in Makefile
- Previous by thread: Re: no route to host
- Next by thread: Re: no route to host
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
