Re: problem on /proc/self/exe and /proc/num/exe
- From: "William" <snowingbear@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 30 Aug 2006 23:08:38 -0700
Paul:
Paul Pluzhnikov wrote:
You have to get your "test ld" out of the way by linking it at aThank you for your great help. I think I need to change ld script
different address (using a linker script), or get your "hello"
executable out of the way by building it as a position-independent:
now, because I can not force the user to use the compiler option.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: problem on /proc/self/exe and /proc/num/exe
- From: Paul Pluzhnikov
- Re: problem on /proc/self/exe and /proc/num/exe
- References:
- problem on /proc/self/exe and /proc/num/exe
- From: William
- Re: problem on /proc/self/exe and /proc/num/exe
- From: Paul Pluzhnikov
- problem on /proc/self/exe and /proc/num/exe
- Prev by Date: Re: SIGSEGV handler Question
- Next by Date: linux programming
- Previous by thread: Re: problem on /proc/self/exe and /proc/num/exe
- Next by thread: Re: problem on /proc/self/exe and /proc/num/exe
- Index(es):