Re: Shared libraries worth it?
- From: "David Schwartz" <davids@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 11 Sep 2006 15:18:21 -0700
Carlos Moreno wrote:
I have an application written in C++ that is more or less CPU-intensive
(it does a recursive tree-traversal trying all possible outcomes of
something, to choose the best option among a set of choices).
The thing is, at peak times (it's part of an online system), there may
be 200 to 300 instances of that application running simultaneously;
each of them takes about 1MB or memory.
I'm running FC4 on a P4 3GHz with 1GB of RAM.
This seems rather foolish. If you don't have 200 or 300 CPUs, what's
the point of running 200 or 300 instances of a CPU-intensive process?
DS
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Shared libraries worth it?
- From: jasen
- Re: Shared libraries worth it?
- From: Carlos Moreno
- Re: Shared libraries worth it?
- References:
- Shared libraries worth it?
- From: Carlos Moreno
- Shared libraries worth it?
- Prev by Date: Re: Can't cancel gethostbyname with a pthread_cancel on linux.
- Next by Date: Re: Shared libraries worth it?
- Previous by thread: Re: Shared libraries worth it?
- Next by thread: Re: Shared libraries worth it?
- Index(es):