Re: scope of linux in the corporates...


joseph2k wrote:

Thus only the GPL part of the source to the whole site must be disclosed.

Why would you impose a requirement not found in the GPL? The GPL does
not require you to disclose the source code to anyone who does not have
a binary.

DS

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: GUI
    ... completely open source....you can use one of the best toolkits around ... for No Fee under the GPL. ... The GPL doesn't put any restrictions or impose ... If you want to give your software away, and not impose any restrictions ...
    (comp.unix.programmer)
  • Re: GPLd library in commercial program?
    ... As far as I understand the GPL, I cannot use source code licenced under that model in commercial applications unless I disclose the source of the latter. ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
  • Re: GPL V3 and Linux - Dead Copyright Holders
    ... of the GPL. ... protect copyright. ... The DMCA implicitly ... impose restrictions. ...
    (Linux-Kernel)
  • RE: GPL V3 and Linux - Dead Copyright Holders
    ... > 1.- Distribute a kernel with some DRM built-in under the GPL. ... The restriction is not imposed by the law, ... to indirectly impose additional conditions. ...
    (Linux-Kernel)
  • Re: Red Hat subscription agreement questions
    ...  "You may not impose any further restrictions on the ...  Does the GPL forbid Red ... Hat from imposing or enforcing the subscription agreement? ...
    (RedHat)