Re: C or C++ for FOSS/linux?
- From: Sebastian 'lunar' Wiesner <basti.wiesner@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:18:20 +0100
Ulrich.Teichert@xxxxxx <Ulrich.Teichert@xxxxxx> typed
Besides, I don't really like Qt - not because it's bloated, for which
there are arguments, agreed, but because it reinvents the wheel for
basic types like strings (QString instead of STL-strings, for
instance). It does not make it faster as well.
QT is older than STL. By the time, Trolltech started QT there was no STL
stuff in the C++ standard, so Trolltech integrated their own classes
instead of relying on non-standard libraries...
And once classes made into a library, it's difficult to get them out
again without breaking with most of the legacy code out there...
After all, programming open source should be fun, right?
Definitely! That's, why I use python most of the time ;)
--
Freedom is always the freedom of dissenters.
(Rosa Luxemburg)
.
- References:
- C or C++ for FOSS/linux?
- From: Beowulf
- Re: C or C++ for FOSS/linux?
- From: Jan Panteltje
- Re: C or C++ for FOSS/linux?
- From: Sebastian 'lunar' Wiesner
- Re: C or C++ for FOSS/linux?
- From: Jan Panteltje
- Re: C or C++ for FOSS/linux?
- From: Ulrich . Teichert
- C or C++ for FOSS/linux?
- Prev by Date: Re: C or C++ for FOSS/linux?
- Next by Date: Re: C or C++ for FOSS/linux?
- Previous by thread: Re: C or C++ for FOSS/linux?
- Next by thread: Qt and basic types Re: C or C++ for FOSS/linux?
- Index(es):