Re: static class members, shared libs and other vegetables
- From: jasen <jasen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 27 Mar 2007 11:32:05 GMT
On 2007-03-27, Paul Pluzhnikov <ppluzhnikov-nsp@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Win32 uses a "DLL is a self-contained entity; nothing should change
its behaviour once it has been built" model.
Most UNIXes use a "linking against DSO is just like linking against
archive; you should be able to override any symbols in it with your
own" model. The "first instance" of your DSO overrides symbols in
the "second instance".
can you point me to a good reference that covers these differences.
I've been put in-charge of porting some software
(http://www.treshna.com/software/paymaster) to windows (using i586mingw32)
and it's proving challenging, the code compiles ok, but some of the 'plugin'
DLLs won't link.
--
Bye.
Jasen
.
- References:
- static class members, shared libs and other vegetables
- From: Maor Avni
- Re: static class members, shared libs and other vegetables
- From: Paul Pluzhnikov
- static class members, shared libs and other vegetables
- Prev by Date: Re: New Linux kernel written in BASIC to be released in 5 days.
- Next by Date: Re: New Linux kernel written in BASIC to be released in 5 days.
- Previous by thread: Re: static class members, shared libs and other vegetables
- Next by thread: New Linux kernel written in BASIC to be released in 5 days.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
