Re: which framework
- From: Måns Rullgård <mans@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 18:42:58 +0100
Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Måns Rullgård <mans@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
josh <xdevel1999@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
On 23 Apr, 06:19, Bill Pursell <bill.purs...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Apr 22, 9:26 pm, josh <xdevel1...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi, after learning c++ base language I'd like to programming with a
complete c++ framework for Linux (like Java has) , but I don't know
what to choose between qt and gtkmm.
[...]
No, I'd like to know which of these two APIs are best to having a
complete set of libraries like Java has. GUI, File, db access and so
on...
I'm puzzled as to why people want wrappers for everything. What's so
terrible about calling the real thing directly?
'Paint the thing green and call it something else' (metaphorically
speaking) is a well-established problem-solving approach of
theoretical compurer science.
I prefer calling it problem creating. At least that's all it's ever
done for me.
And they teach that to innocent minors.
Indeed they do.
--
Måns Rullgård
mans@xxxxxxxxx
.
- References:
- which framework
- From: josh
- Re: which framework
- From: Bill Pursell
- Re: which framework
- From: josh
- Re: which framework
- From: Måns Rullgård
- Re: which framework
- From: Rainer Weikusat
- which framework
- Prev by Date: Re: Serial programming + USB GSM modem
- Next by Date: Copy File programmatically
- Previous by thread: Re: which framework
- Next by thread: Re: which framework
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|