Re: howto get rid of 'pointer arguments differ in signedness'
- From: Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2007 14:34:09 +0200
Dildo Baggins <el_simeon@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Rainer Weikusat wrote:
Excuse me if this is still common knowledge, but there is reason to
believe in the opposite ...
I usually strive for code that yelds no warning, because every one
could be a bugs source.
There are actually arguments against using obfuscation tricks too
'sophisticated' for the gcc code analyzer to silence pointless
compilation noises. At least they ... well ... obfuscate the
code.
Anyway, couldn't you just add the -Wno-pointer-sign to the makefile?
The same way I could just change all the code I am using, could just
maintain a compiler for x86 separate from the one included in the
distribution I am using, could just ignore the warning, could just
fork the compiler outright, could just write my own compiler etc.
None of which is going to improve the behaviour of this compiler.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: howto get rid of 'pointer arguments differ in signedness'
- From: Dildo Baggins
- Re: howto get rid of 'pointer arguments differ in signedness'
- References:
- howto get rid of 'pointer arguments differ in signedness'
- From: Rainer Weikusat
- Re: howto get rid of 'pointer arguments differ in signedness'
- From: Dildo Baggins
- howto get rid of 'pointer arguments differ in signedness'
- Prev by Date: Re: howto get rid of 'pointer arguments differ in signedness'
- Next by Date: Re: howto get rid of 'pointer arguments differ in signedness'
- Previous by thread: Re: howto get rid of 'pointer arguments differ in signedness'
- Next by thread: Re: howto get rid of 'pointer arguments differ in signedness'
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|