Re: stack trace without core
- From: RezaRob <RezaRob@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 11:33:59 -0700
On Jun 22, 7:04 am, Jasen <j...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 2007-06-22, RezaRob <Reza...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Is there a way to generate a brief view of the stack without dumping
entire core?
attach gdb to the process?
This isn't an option because it's in "production mode" and only in the
event of an exception I need a stack trace.
How about generating a core file which is truncated to a
given size?
using ulimit?
When I use ulimit, instead of getting a truncated core, I seem to be
getting none at all. Am I doing something wrong?
Thanks a lot for replying Jasen.
Reza.
Bye.
Jasen
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: stack trace without core
- From: Bin Chen
- Re: stack trace without core
- From: David Schwartz
- Re: stack trace without core
- References:
- stack trace without core
- From: RezaRob
- Re: stack trace without core
- From: Jasen
- stack trace without core
- Prev by Date: Re: My way to check if a progam is already running
- Next by Date: Re: My way to check if a progam is already running
- Previous by thread: Re: stack trace without core
- Next by thread: Re: stack trace without core
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|