Re: Serial (RS232) communication - failing to detect stop bit
- From: David Given <dg@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 00:04:29 +0100
arka.n.roy wrote:
[...]
However on PC-2 when I used the Linux (Xandros) partition on PC-2, in
test cases 3 and 4 and 5, I used Minicom.
Minicom is, unfortunately, also crap... it's far too complicated, far too slow
(there are hard-coded pauses in the menu system, for heavens' sake!) and
requires a lot of tedious reconfiguration to stop is spewing garbage down the
serial line on startup and shutdown.
Check out cu. It's an incredibly simple serial terminal from the UUCP days. It
does exactly what you tell it, when you tell it to, and otherwise gets out of
your way --- exactly what's useful in this sort of situation...
--
┌── dg@cowlark.com ─── http://www.cowlark.com ───────────────────
│
│ "There does not now, nor will there ever, exist a programming language in
│ which it is the least bit hard to write bad programs." --- Flon's Axiom
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Serial (RS232) communication - failing to detect stop bit
- From: arka.n.roy
- Re: Serial (RS232) communication - failing to detect stop bit
- From: Rainer Weikusat
- Re: Serial (RS232) communication - failing to detect stop bit
- References:
- Re: Serial (RS232) communication - failing to detect stop bit
- From: arka.n.roy
- Re: Serial (RS232) communication - failing to detect stop bit
- From: Grant Edwards
- Re: Serial (RS232) communication - failing to detect stop bit
- From: arka.n.roy
- Re: Serial (RS232) communication - failing to detect stop bit
- Prev by Date: Re: Serial (RS232) communication - failing to detect stop bit
- Next by Date: A problem about OpenInventor 6.1.0
- Previous by thread: Re: Serial (RS232) communication - failing to detect stop bit
- Next by thread: Re: Serial (RS232) communication - failing to detect stop bit
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|