Re: I can't find gdk source tarballs and am serious pissed
- From: Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 15 Feb 2008 18:02:14 -0700
"Ivan" <idiprima@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
gtk != gnome. I use gtk (gtkmm, actuall) a lot, avoid gnome if at all
possible.
why?
Why which? :)
gtk+ -- I find it to be a well organized set of widgets that matches
well to the way I work.
gtkmm -- maps the widgets to classes in what I find to be a very
straightforward way, though it adds the temptation to entangle GUI
with program logic.
gnome -- the moment I start using any gnome features, compiling and
running the resulting application seems to call for every daemon and
the development version of every library in the history of gnome.
When I've distributed applications that used gnome, the people who
downloaded it uniformly got frustrated with the sheer number of
additional packages they had to also download to get it to work.
.
- References:
- I can't find gdk source tarballs and am serious pissed
- From: Squat'n Dive
- Re: I can't find gdk source tarballs and am serious pissed
- From: Joe Pfeiffer
- Re: I can't find gdk source tarballs and am serious pissed
- From: Ivan
- I can't find gdk source tarballs and am serious pissed
- Prev by Date: Re: pthread_cond_signal is mutex lock/unlock needed ?
- Next by Date: Re: portable application
- Previous by thread: Re: I can't find gdk source tarballs and am serious pissed
- Next by thread: [Commercial] Training on Linux System and Kernel Programming from Professionals
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
