Re: Stack consumption in NPTL
- From: llothar <llothar@xxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2008 03:01:08 -0800 (PST)
On 7 Mrz., 16:39, Chetan <chetan...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Is this the case? Is it documented anywhere?
I asked this many times. Nobody can answer it. It is AFAIK only
specified
on MacOSX where then MachTask has a 16KB kernel stack. I wasn't even
getting an answer on this list if there is a different kernel stack
and what default
size it is. This and the initial glibc stack allocations are the only
thing that
are important. Everything else should have no influence on the stack
size.
I myself use 32 as minimum + what i allocate on the stack and it
hasn't failed yet.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Stack consumption in NPTL
- From: Rainer Weikusat
- Re: Stack consumption in NPTL
- References:
- Stack consumption in NPTL
- From: Chetan
- Stack consumption in NPTL
- Prev by Date: Stack consumption in NPTL
- Next by Date: Re: Stack consumption in NPTL
- Previous by thread: Stack consumption in NPTL
- Next by thread: Re: Stack consumption in NPTL
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|