Re: Autoconf: AC_PREREQ macro query
- From: markhobley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Mark Hobley)
- Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 19:08:01 GMT
Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I would be wary with this. One of the nice properties of auto* is
being completely unportable - building will not work except if
explicit support for a particular platform has already been added
Hmmm. All I am trying to do is split the package bundles into separate
components. I am hoping to use autotools for the sole purpose of
generating a makefile to enable me to compile the component.
The original configure scripts and makefiles are designed for building
the component suite, and complain about missing files for components
that I am not trying to build.
I thought that using autotools would simply regenerate the configure
script and makefile for the separated component.
My architecture is not alien. I am using an IBM compatible computer
running Linux, and my processor is IA32 compatible, so the platform is
known to autotools. I am not concerned with building for multiple
architectures. I just want a makefile that will enable me to compile on
and for an i386 compatible machine.
I've got a whole load of bundled packages waiting to be split.
Mark.
--
Mark Hobley
Linux User: #370818 http://markhobley.yi.org/
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Autoconf: AC_PREREQ macro query
- From: Rainer Weikusat
- Autoconf: is there an simplistic alternative for generating makefiles?
- From: Mark Hobley
- Re: Autoconf: AC_PREREQ macro query
- References:
- Autoconf: AC_PREREQ macro query
- From: Mark Hobley
- Re: Autoconf: AC_PREREQ macro query
- From: Mark Hobley
- Re: Autoconf: AC_PREREQ macro query
- From: Rainer Weikusat
- Autoconf: AC_PREREQ macro query
- Prev by Date: Re: Real time signals reordering at reception
- Next by Date: Re: Autoconf: difference between dnl and #
- Previous by thread: Re: Autoconf: AC_PREREQ macro query
- Next by thread: Autoconf: is there an simplistic alternative for generating makefiles?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|