comp.os.linux.development.apps

• Date Index

---

• artful dodger long jeans manufacturers,(www.trade8.cc), rabbitwood
• make[2]: *** No rule to make target `all'. Stop., Mark Hobley
  • Re: make[2]: *** No rule to make target `all'. Stop., Gang Greene
    • Re: make[2]: *** No rule to make target `all'. Stop., Mark Hobley
      • Re: make[2]: *** No rule to make target `all'. Stop., Mark Hobley
• redirection, Simone F.
  • Re: redirection, Simone F.
  • Re: redirection, Jasen Betts
• Find easy what you need for Linux, waske98@xxxxxxxxx
• Query File System Naming Rules?, David
  • Re: Query File System Naming Rules?, Lew Pitcher
    • Re: Query File System Naming Rules?, David
      • Re: Query File System Naming Rules?, Jasen Betts
      • Re: Query File System Naming Rules?, David
      • Re: Query File System Naming Rules?, Måns Rullgård
      • Re: Query File System Naming Rules?, Måns Rullgård
  • Re: Query File System Naming Rules?, David Schwartz
• How to send the data from 1 process more process using sockets!, Aura Networks
  • Re: How to send the data from 1 process more process using sockets!, David Schwartz
    • Re: How to send the data from 1 process more process using sockets!, Aura Networks
      • Re: How to send the data from 1 process more process using sockets!, Josef Moellers
      • Re: How to send the data from 1 process more process using sockets!, Joe Beanfish
      • Re: How to send the data from 1 process more process using sockets!, David Schwartz
• Troubel with makefile, Gang Greene
  • Re: Troubel with makefile, Simone F.
    • Re: Troubel with makefile, Gang Greene
• Join new Linux community, Eng . Ahmed Hamdy
• Host Unlimited Web Sites!!!!!!!!!, matca1991@xxxxxxxxx
• gtk tutorial - error?, Antonio Macchi
  • Re: gtk tutorial - error?, Antonio Macchi
  • Re: gtk tutorial - error?, Bernhard Agthe
    • Re: gtk tutorial - error?, zentara
• get terminal width and height, Gernot Frisch
  • Re: get terminal width and height, Vitus Jensen
    • Re: get terminal width and height, Gernot Frisch
      • Re: get terminal width and height, Vitus Jensen
      • Re: get terminal width and height, Jasen Betts
      • Re: get terminal width and height, Grant Edwards
      • Re: get terminal width and height, Jasen Betts
      • Re: get terminal width and height, Grant Edwards
      • Re: get terminal width and height, Thomas Dickey
  • Re: get terminal width and height, Jasen Betts
    • Re: get terminal width and height, Gernot Frisch
      • Re: get terminal width and height, Joe Pfeiffer
  • Re: get terminal width and height, Michael F Gordon
    • Re: get terminal width and height, Grant Edwards
• LGPL - OK to statically link if a dynamically link version provided?, fft1976@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: LGPL - OK to statically link if a dynamically link version provided?, Jasen Betts
  • Re: LGPL - OK to statically link if a dynamically link version provided?, Christof Meerwald
    • Re: LGPL - OK to statically link if a dynamically link version provided?, fft1976@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: LGPL - OK to statically link if a dynamically link version provided?, Christof Meerwald
      • Re: LGPL - OK to statically link if a dynamically link version provided?, fft1976@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: LGPL - OK to statically link if a dynamically link version provided?, Rainer Weikusat
      • Re: LGPL - OK to statically link if a dynamically link version provided?, Bernhard Agthe
      • Re: LGPL - OK to statically link if a dynamically link version provided?, fft1976@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: LGPL - OK to statically link if a dynamically link version provided?, John Hasler
      • Re: LGPL - OK to statically link if a dynamically link version provided?, Rainer Weikusat
      • Re: LGPL - OK to statically link if a dynamically link version provided?, fft1976@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: LGPL - OK to statically link if a dynamically link version provided?, Rainer Weikusat
      • Re: LGPL - OK to statically link if a dynamically link version provided?, fft1976@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: LGPL - OK to statically link if a dynamically link version provided?, Rainer Weikusat
      • Re: LGPL - OK to statically link if a dynamically link version provided?, Lew Pitcher
      • Re: LGPL - OK to statically link if a dynamically link version provided?, David Schwartz
      • Re: LGPL - OK to statically link if a dynamically link version provided?, Rainer Weikusat
      • Re: LGPL - OK to statically link if a dynamically link version provided?, David Schwartz
      • Re: LGPL - OK to statically link if a dynamically link version provided?, Rainer Weikusat
      • Re: LGPL - OK to statically link if a dynamically link version provided?, David Schwartz
      • Re: LGPL - OK to statically link if a dynamically link version provided?, Rainer Weikusat
      • Re: LGPL - OK to statically link if a dynamically link version provided?, David Schwartz
      • Re: LGPL - OK to statically link if a dynamically link version provided?, Rainer Weikusat
      • Re: LGPL - OK to statically link if a dynamically link version provided?, David Schwartz
      • Re: LGPL - OK to statically link if a dynamically link version provided?, John Hasler
• Removing an instruction from the binutils opcode tables, Mark Hobley
  • Re: Removing an instruction from the binutils opcode tables, Nate Eldredge
    • Re: Removing an instruction from the binutils opcode tables, Mark Hobley
      • Re: Removing an instruction from the binutils opcode tables, David Schwartz
      • Re: Removing an instruction from the binutils opcode tables, Måns Rullgård
      • Re: Removing an instruction from the binutils opcode tables, David Schwartz
      • Re: Removing an instruction from the binutils opcode tables, Mark Hobley
      • Re: Removing an instruction from the binutils opcode tables, David Schwartz
      • Re: Removing an instruction from the binutils opcode tables, Mark Hobley
      • Re: Removing an instruction from the binutils opcode tables, David Schwartz
      • Re: Removing an instruction from the binutils opcode tables, Mark Hobley
      • Re: Removing an instruction from the binutils opcode tables, David Schwartz
  • Re: Removing an instruction from the binutils opcode tables, Mark Hobley
• Best way to use a shared library in a non-standard location, Sean DeNigris
  • Re: Best way to use a shared library in a non-standard location, Sean DeNigris
  • Re: Best way to use a shared library in a non-standard location, Jasen Betts
• arrays are not tables?, Antonio Macchi
  • Re: arrays are not tables?, Lew Pitcher
  • Re: arrays are not tables?, Lew Pitcher
  • Re: arrays are not tables?, Jens Thoms Toerring
    • Re: arrays are not tables?, Antonio Macchi
  • Re: arrays are not tables?, David Schwartz
    • Re: arrays are not tables?, Antonio Macchi
      • Re: arrays are not tables?, David Schwartz
      • Re: arrays are not tables? - going OT, bs
      • Re: arrays are not tables? - going OT, Nate Eldredge
      • Re: arrays are not tables? - going OT, bs
      • Re: arrays are not tables? - going OT, David Schwartz
• libmail - a mail handling library, Dimitris Mandalidis
  • Re: libmail - a mail handling library, Rainer Weikusat
    • Re: libmail - a mail handling library, Dimitris Mandalidis
  • Re: libmail - a mail handling library, Jasen Betts
• difference between x[10] and (*x)[10], Antonio Macchi
  • Re: difference between x[10] and (*x)[10], Antonio Macchi
    • Re: difference between x[10] and (*x)[10], Måns Rullgård
    • Re: difference between x[10] and (*x)[10], Jens Thoms Toerring
      • Re: difference between x[10] and (*x)[10], Rainer Weikusat
      • Re: difference between x[10] and (*x)[10], Jens Thoms Toerring
      • Re: difference between x[10] and (*x)[10], Rainer Weikusat
      • Re: difference between x[10] and (*x)[10], Jens Thoms Toerring
  • Re: difference between x[10] and (*x)[10], Måns Rullgård
• is this correct?, Antonio Macchi
  • Re: is this correct?, Lew Pitcher
    • Re: is this correct?, Antonio Macchi
      • Re: is this correct?, Jens Thoms Toerring
      • Re: is this correct?, Jasen Betts
    • Re: is this correct?, Antonio Macchi
      • Re: is this correct?, David Schwartz
      • Re: is this correct?, Antonio Macchi
      • Re: is this correct?, David Schwartz
      • Re: is this correct?, Jasen Betts
      • Re: is this correct?, Antonio Macchi
• Reading AC_ARG_WITH options, chris119
  • Re: Reading AC_ARG_WITH options, William Pursell
    • Re: Reading AC_ARG_WITH options, William Pursell
• Linux Apps - Best way to Handle Dependencies, PurpleServerMonkey
  • Re: Linux Apps - Best way to Handle Dependencies, Joe Pfeiffer
    • Re: Linux Apps - Best way to Handle Dependencies, PurpleServerMonkey
      • Re: Linux Apps - Best way to Handle Dependencies, Jan Panteltje
      • Re: Linux Apps - Best way to Handle Dependencies, PurpleServerMonkey
      • Re: Linux Apps - Best way to Handle Dependencies, Joe Pfeiffer
      • Re: Linux Apps - Best way to Handle Dependencies, Jan Panteltje
      • Re: Linux Apps - Best way to Handle Dependencies, Joe Pfeiffer
• Re: Should I get Solaris or Fedora for a future startup?, David Schwartz
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Should I get Solaris or Fedora for a future startup?, William Pursell
    • Message not available
      • Re: Should I get Solaris or Fedora for a future startup?, John Hasler
• Linux equivalent for ioctlsocket(FIONREAD) on datagram sockets, already5chosen
  • Re: Linux equivalent for ioctlsocket(FIONREAD) on datagram sockets, David Schwartz
    • Re: Linux equivalent for ioctlsocket(FIONREAD) on datagram sockets, already5chosen
      • Re: Linux equivalent for ioctlsocket(FIONREAD) on datagram sockets, David Schwartz
      • Re: Linux equivalent for ioctlsocket(FIONREAD) on datagram sockets, already5chosen
      • Re: Linux equivalent for ioctlsocket(FIONREAD) on datagram sockets, David Schwartz
      • Re: Linux equivalent for ioctlsocket(FIONREAD) on datagram sockets, already5chosen
      • Re: Linux equivalent for ioctlsocket(FIONREAD) on datagram sockets, David Schwartz
• linux packet filter, Xend
• deadlock detection, dbtouch
• "-pthread -static" + RHEL4 + C++ exceptions => segfault, fft1976
  • Re: "-pthread -static" + RHEL4 + C++ exceptions => segfault, ta0kira
  • Re: "-pthread -static" + RHEL4 + C++ exceptions => segfault, Jacek Dziedzic
• checking libc version in installation script, fft1976
  • Re: checking libc version in installation script, ta0kira
    • Re: checking libc version in installation script, fft1976
      • Re: checking libc version in installation script, ta0kira
  • Re: checking libc version in installation script, Huibert Bol
  • Re: checking libc version in installation script, Jasen Betts
• Read console output and store it into buffer ?, N.V.T
  • Re: Read console output and store it into buffer ?, Jens Thoms Toerring
    • Re: Read console output and store it into buffer ?, N.V.T
      • Re: Read console output and store it into buffer ?, Jens Thoms Toerring
      • Re: Read console output and store it into buffer ?, N.V.T
  • Re: Read console output and store it into buffer ?, Ryan McCoskrie
    • Re: Read console output and store it into buffer ?, Erik Max Francis
      • Re: Read console output and store it into buffer ?, Joe Beanfish
  • Re: Read console output and store it into buffer ?, Jasen Betts
• configure: error: cannot guess build type; you must specify one, Mark Hobley
  • Re: configure: error: cannot guess build type; you must specify one, Gil Hamilton
    • Re: configure: error: cannot guess build type; you must specify one, Mark Hobley
• Recommendations for Profiling?, 2DevOrNot2Dev
• Re: Why is sem_wait() not undone when my program crashes?, Rainer Weikusat
  • Re: Why is sem_wait() not undone when my program crashes?, John Hasler
• Re: Floating point in Bash scripts?? - Thanks!, Charles Sullivan
• Re: Floating point in Bash scripts??, Antonio Macchi
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Floating point in Bash scripts??, Antonio Macchi
• Re: Tracking down conditional compilation definitions, Johannes Dohmen
  • Re: Tracking down conditional compilation definitions, Mark Hobley
    • Re: Tracking down conditional compilation definitions, Johannes Dohmen
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Tracking down conditional compilation definitions, Mark Hobley

• Security
• UNIX
• Linux
• Coding
• Usenet

• Mailing-Lists
• Newsgroups
• About
• Privacy
• Search
• Imprint

linux.derkeiler.com  > Newsgroups  > comp.os.linux.development.apps  > 2009-03