kernel vs module versioning at insmod-time ... confused!!
From: Bill Halchin (bill.halchin_at_osatechnologies.com)
Date: 07/24/03
- Next message: alex: "redhat 9.0 segmentation fault"
- Previous message: Pete Zaitcev: "Re: VMA nopage connecting to physical memory"
- Next in thread: Lee Merrill: "Re: kernel vs module versioning at insmod-time ... confused!!"
- Reply: Lee Merrill: "Re: kernel vs module versioning at insmod-time ... confused!!"
- Reply: Neil Horman: "Re: kernel vs module versioning at insmod-time ... confused!!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 22:57:27 GMT
Hello,
In our company there is an ongoing debate on this issue. We are
distributing the binary of a driver. Do we have to build a driver binary
for each different kernel binary's "kernel_version" string. Is this true? (I
am currently reading the insmod.c source. I reread Rubini 2nd edition. He
says that there a simple comparision between the kernel's "kernel_version"
with the module's "kernel_version". Please help me understand how versioning
participates in module loading!
Regards, Bill
- Next message: alex: "redhat 9.0 segmentation fault"
- Previous message: Pete Zaitcev: "Re: VMA nopage connecting to physical memory"
- Next in thread: Lee Merrill: "Re: kernel vs module versioning at insmod-time ... confused!!"
- Reply: Lee Merrill: "Re: kernel vs module versioning at insmod-time ... confused!!"
- Reply: Neil Horman: "Re: kernel vs module versioning at insmod-time ... confused!!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|