static vs dynamic compiled versions of programs redhat 9.0 segmentation fault
From: alex (jalexsalians_at_satx.rr.com)
Date: 07/25/03
- Next message: ellis_at_no.spam: "Re: Alan Cox kernels"
- Previous message: phil-news-nospam_at_ipal.net: "how to keep tcpdump running?"
- Next in thread: Ken Prox: "Re: static vs dynamic compiled versions of programs redhat 9.0 segmentation fault"
- Reply: Ken Prox: "Re: static vs dynamic compiled versions of programs redhat 9.0 segmentation fault"
- Reply: phil-news-nospam_at_ipal.net: "Re: static vs dynamic compiled versions of programs redhat 9.0 segmentation fault"
- Reply: Kasper Dupont: "Re: static vs dynamic compiled versions of programs redhat 9.0 segmentation fault"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 01:59:28 GMT
I have probably exhausted everyone with my questions about segmentation
faults and redhat 9.0
now I find out that the database executable are statically compiled(?) and
that that may be the problem with redhat 9.0. If so is there any solution?
Alex
- Next message: ellis_at_no.spam: "Re: Alan Cox kernels"
- Previous message: phil-news-nospam_at_ipal.net: "how to keep tcpdump running?"
- Next in thread: Ken Prox: "Re: static vs dynamic compiled versions of programs redhat 9.0 segmentation fault"
- Reply: Ken Prox: "Re: static vs dynamic compiled versions of programs redhat 9.0 segmentation fault"
- Reply: phil-news-nospam_at_ipal.net: "Re: static vs dynamic compiled versions of programs redhat 9.0 segmentation fault"
- Reply: Kasper Dupont: "Re: static vs dynamic compiled versions of programs redhat 9.0 segmentation fault"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
