Tiny glitch in 2.6.0-test2
From: Timothy Murphy (tim_at_birdsnest.maths.tcd.ie)
Date: 07/28/03
- Next message: David W Noon: "Re: C program question and os limitation?"
- Previous message: Timothy Murphy: "Re: Compiling kernel 2.4.22pre<latest> errors WAS: HFS+ Driver"
- Next in thread: Kasper Dupont: "Re: Tiny glitch in 2.6.0-test2"
- Reply: Kasper Dupont: "Re: Tiny glitch in 2.6.0-test2"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 15:05:56 +0100
I had a tiny glitch in patch-2.6.0-test2 --
assuming this was meant to be applied to patch-2.6.0-test1.
The last item was rejected.
However, this did not matter, as it only added to a comment to the file.
===================================================
The next patch would create the file usr/initramfs_data.S,
which already exists! Assume -R? [n] n
Apply anyway? [n] y
patching file usr/initramfs_data.S
Patch attempted to create file usr/initramfs_data.S, which already exists.
Hunk #1 FAILED at 1.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file usr/initramfs_data.S.rej
===================================================
-- Timothy Murphy e-mail: tim@birdsnest.maths.tcd.ie tel: +353-86-233 6090 s-mail: School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland
- Next message: David W Noon: "Re: C program question and os limitation?"
- Previous message: Timothy Murphy: "Re: Compiling kernel 2.4.22pre<latest> errors WAS: HFS+ Driver"
- Next in thread: Kasper Dupont: "Re: Tiny glitch in 2.6.0-test2"
- Reply: Kasper Dupont: "Re: Tiny glitch in 2.6.0-test2"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|