Re: Fast memcpy in kernel space
From: Tim Roberts (timr_at_probo.com)
Date: 08/12/03
- Next message: Kasper Dupont: "Re: image dump of hidden X session"
- Previous message: phil-news-nospam_at_ipal.net: "a filesystem for partitions"
- In reply to: Jayr Al-Dyn: "Re: Fast memcpy in kernel space"
- Next in thread: phil-news-nospam_at_ipal.net: "Re: Fast memcpy in kernel space"
- Reply: phil-news-nospam_at_ipal.net: "Re: Fast memcpy in kernel space"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 22:29:07 -0700
Jayr Al-Dyn <jayraldyn@jayraldyn.net> wrote:
>
>I think the best way is to have two processes: one of them in user mode,
>capturing from the X server (with XGetImage, I guess) and the other as a
>kernel module receiving data from the first one and delivering to a
>/dev/video device.
I doubt it. What are you actually trying to do? Are you trying to
implement a screen-capture program? You should probably investigate some
of the XFree86 extensions to get access to the frame buffer directly.
XGetImage is not the most efficient method. Xshm might be a good choice.
-- - Tim Roberts, timr@probo.com Providenza & Boekelheide, Inc.
- Next message: Kasper Dupont: "Re: image dump of hidden X session"
- Previous message: phil-news-nospam_at_ipal.net: "a filesystem for partitions"
- In reply to: Jayr Al-Dyn: "Re: Fast memcpy in kernel space"
- Next in thread: phil-news-nospam_at_ipal.net: "Re: Fast memcpy in kernel space"
- Reply: phil-news-nospam_at_ipal.net: "Re: Fast memcpy in kernel space"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]