Re: a filesystem for partitions
phil-news-nospam_at_ipal.net
Date: 08/12/03
- Next message: phil-news-nospam_at_ipal.net: "Re: forking a process that has multiple threads"
- Previous message: phil-news-nospam_at_ipal.net: "Re: Big integers in kernel"
- In reply to: Frank Sweetser: "Re: a filesystem for partitions"
- Next in thread: Frank Sweetser: "Re: a filesystem for partitions"
- Reply: Frank Sweetser: "Re: a filesystem for partitions"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 12 Aug 2003 15:55:16 GMT
On Tue, 12 Aug 2003 14:27:33 +0000 (UTC) Frank Sweetser <fs@erwin.wpi.edu> wrote:
| phil-news-nospam@ipal.net <phil-news-nospam@ipal.net> wrote:
|> I have at times wanted to access partitions on devices which did not support
|> partitions:
|> floppy disk
|> CD rom
|> loop back devices
|> other partitions
|>
|> Adding the ability to partition anything can be a problem. It might be
|> better in devfs exclusively. But deciding on fixed major/minor nodes for so
|> many new partitions would eat up the device node space very quickly
|> (especially partitions of partitions carried a few levels deep).
|
| Why not just use LVM? Add the devices to a VG and make LVs out of it instead
| of creating a slew of block devices for each partition.
I have the understanding that LVM adds its own overhead to the storage space.
Or are you just saying to hack the LVM code to only make use of its device space?
-- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Phil Howard KA9WGN | http://linuxhomepage.com/ http://ham.org/ | | (first name) at ipal.net | http://phil.ipal.org/ http://ka9wgn.ham.org/ | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Next message: phil-news-nospam_at_ipal.net: "Re: forking a process that has multiple threads"
- Previous message: phil-news-nospam_at_ipal.net: "Re: Big integers in kernel"
- In reply to: Frank Sweetser: "Re: a filesystem for partitions"
- Next in thread: Frank Sweetser: "Re: a filesystem for partitions"
- Reply: Frank Sweetser: "Re: a filesystem for partitions"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|