Re: How often is rebooting strictly necessary?

From: Linux Inquirer (linuxinquirer_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 03/05/04


Date: 5 Mar 2004 14:46:14 -0800

Josef Möllers <josef.moellers@fujitsu-siemens.com> wrote in message news:<c29kus$doq$1@nntp.fujitsu-siemens.com>...
> James McIninch wrote:
>
> > I do agree that Windows' cyclic-reboot-to-affect-changes is quite
> > distracting. You simply don't experience that under Linux. Keep in mind
> ,
> > Windows was designed with the notion that you work with it for a few ho
> urs
> > and turn off the machine. Linux was designed with the notion that you g
> et
> > the machine up and running and leave it on until the hardware dies of o
> ld
> > age.
>
> It just shows the origins: Windows is based upon the concept of a
> personal computer which, as you point out, is powered on when needed
> and afterwards shut down. Linux has its roots in server OS's (Un*x)
> which tend to run around the clock.

I recently came across this -

Windows 2000 Professional needs to be rebooted in only 7 scenarios -
[NT 4 had 50]

1. Changing ISA adapter configuration
2. Changing the system font (the USER and Graphics Device Interface
have to be 3. recreated)
4. Adding and removing communication ports (due to possible jumper
changes)
5. Changing the default system locale
6. Changing the computer/domain name
7. Installing service packs or hotfixes

2000 Server adds these additional scenarios -

1. Running DCPROMO - ie converting a server to a Domain Controller
2. Changing DNS suffix name
3. Switch language in Multilanguage edition
4. Installing Terminal Services
5. After installing Terminal Services most things require a reboot
6. Remove Gateway Services for Netware
7. Change DNS server's IP address



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Future of IT in Lebanon
    ... It's the same Linux code base. ... Microsoft Office on a Windows server, it will install and run fine, the main ...
    (soc.culture.lebanon)
  • Re: Question about Red Hat Linux Enterprise
    ... we have is running Windows 2000 Server ... Luckily running Apache + MySQL on a Linux system is not a lot ... MySQL database and injecting it back into the MySQL installation ...
    (comp.os.linux.networking)
  • Re: Sweet Success
    ... Let's continue to assume that I prefer Windows to anything else: ... neither Linux nor Windows may be the answer. ... While it may well be initially less expensive to install a Linux-based ... of Linux simultaneously, along with Windows Server, AIX, and OS/400. ...
    (RedHat)
  • Re: [Full-disclosure] 70 million computers are using Windows 98 right now
    ... Linux is definitely not a natural migration pathway. ... Windows 2000, Windows XP, and Mac OS X seem to work pretty ... > desktop to server. ... But then the persons across the sea just can't install ...
    (Full-Disclosure)
  • Re: Benutzerkontenverwaltung mit Win 2003 Server - Teil 2
    ... und dann bin ich über Solaris zur ersten 30-Disketten-Version Linux ... Server auch keine grafische Oberfläche, der vi ist halt mein bester ... Und das ganze geht schon in Ansätzen seit Windows NT so ... > Unternehmensnetzwerk unter Unix administrieren könnte. ...
    (microsoft.public.de.german.windows.server.networking)