Re: 64 bit or 32 bit
From: Grant Edwards (grante_at_visi.com)
Date: 04/07/04
- Next message: Jacky Cheung: "ttyS0 program problems"
- Previous message: Vinay Kurien: "Re: free'd address still readable?"
- In reply to: Måns Rullgård: "Re: 64 bit or 32 bit"
- Next in thread: Måns Rullgård: "Re: 64 bit or 32 bit"
- Reply: Måns Rullgård: "Re: 64 bit or 32 bit"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 07 Apr 2004 14:09:05 GMT
On 2004-04-07, Måns Rullgård <mru@kth.se> wrote:
> So when processors become 256-bit, what will we get?
>
> char = 8 bits
> short short = 16 bits
> short = 32 bits
> long short = 64 bits
> int = 128 bits
> long = 256 bits
It really get's confusing when we need even more types and
"long short" and "short long" aren't the same thing.
OTOH, if you want a certain number of bits, you should probably
just ask for them directly using <stdint.h> and int32_t or
uint16_t or int47_t or whatever.
--
Grant Edwards grante Yow! I've been WRITING
at to SOPHIA LOREN every 45
visi.com MINUTES since JANUARY 1ST!!
- Next message: Jacky Cheung: "ttyS0 program problems"
- Previous message: Vinay Kurien: "Re: free'd address still readable?"
- In reply to: Måns Rullgård: "Re: 64 bit or 32 bit"
- Next in thread: Måns Rullgård: "Re: 64 bit or 32 bit"
- Reply: Måns Rullgård: "Re: 64 bit or 32 bit"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]