Re: 2.6 krnel and gcc-3.4.0 ?
From: Catalin Marinas (catalin.marinas_at_arm.com)
Date: 04/29/04
- Next message: jamiewalker_at_wp.shawcable.net: "Bin Laden Captured - photos and video"
- Previous message: Ulrich Lauther: "2.6 krnel and gcc-3.4.0 ?"
- In reply to: Ulrich Lauther: "2.6 krnel and gcc-3.4.0 ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 12:56:13 +0100
Ulrich Lauther <lauther@mchp.siemens.de> writes:
> is it considered save to compile the kernel (for i686) with gcc-3.4.0 ?
Depends on which version of 2.6.x. The 2.6.0 fails to build because
the latest gcc reports an error for the "extern inline" prototype
declarations when the body of the function is defined in a different
file. The might have been changed in the latest (2.6.6-rc2?) kernel.
Another problem I had was using the latest binutils package. The
attribute "unused" has a different (but proper) meaning now. A lot of
global variables are removed when linking, causing problems. I think
this was fixed in the latest kernel.
Catalin
- Next message: jamiewalker_at_wp.shawcable.net: "Bin Laden Captured - photos and video"
- Previous message: Ulrich Lauther: "2.6 krnel and gcc-3.4.0 ?"
- In reply to: Ulrich Lauther: "2.6 krnel and gcc-3.4.0 ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
