Re: differences in hex dump and disassembly
From: Erik de Castro Lopo (nospam_at_mega-nerd.com)
Date: 07/28/04
- Next message: Thomas Richter: "Re: Skipping initrd phase in boot process"
- Previous message: Sting: "Skipping initrd phase in boot process"
- In reply to: Vinay: "differences in hex dump and disassembly"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 17:35:16 +1000
Vinay wrote:
>
> Hello
>
<snip>
> I dont find any problem doing these. When I see the hex dump (x
> command in gdb) of the function, I can see that the first instruction
> of the function has been changed. But when I do "disassemble" of the
> function in gdb, I find that the disassembly is same as the original
> function!!, but the hex dump shows the new change. Why this difference
> ?
It could be that the disassember is disassembling what is on
disk instead of what is in memory.
Erik
-- +-----------------------------------------------------------+ Erik de Castro Lopo nospam@mega-nerd.com (Yes it's valid) +-----------------------------------------------------------+ "Microsoft treats security vulnerabilities as public relations problems." -- Bruce Schneier
- Next message: Thomas Richter: "Re: Skipping initrd phase in boot process"
- Previous message: Sting: "Skipping initrd phase in boot process"
- In reply to: Vinay: "differences in hex dump and disassembly"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]