memory addressing
hsbackup_at_gmail.com
Date: 01/27/05
- Next message: shiva: "a basic doubt on static functions..."
- Previous message: John Reiser: "Re: RedHat 9 versus AS3 (testing an application)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 26 Jan 2005 15:44:03 -0800
The linux port of XSB, (http://xsb.sf.net), has stopped working with
kernel versions > 2.6.9. XSB has been using the highest bit in the
memory address for tagging. This seems to cause a segmentation fault.
What changed in the linux memory managment between 2.6.8 and 2.6.9? XSB
does have the capability of stealing other bits of an address word for
tagging, how can i figure out which ones are safe. Assume we only need
to build XSB for systems with less than 1Gb of physical memory. TIA.
- Next message: shiva: "a basic doubt on static functions..."
- Previous message: John Reiser: "Re: RedHat 9 versus AS3 (testing an application)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
