Re: Is there a way to use substitutes of fixup() and _dl_lookup_symbol() in glibc?

From: Lawrence Kirby (lknews_at_netactive.co.uk)
Date: 02/03/05


Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 10:32:45 +0000

On Wed, 02 Feb 2005 20:31:24 -0800, Jinghao wrote:

> Hi,
>
> During my research work, I need to call my own functions instead of
> calling the runtime function "fixup()" and the internal function
> "_dl_lookup_symbol()" in libc.so.

Please note that the internals of glibc are well off-topic for
comp.lang.c. Followups set.

Lawrence



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Is there a way to use substitutes of fixup() and _dl_lookup_symbol() in glibc?
    ... > During my research work, I need to call my own functions instead of ... Please note that the internals of glibc are well off-topic for ... Followups set. ...
    (comp.lang.c)
  • Re: FC2 and glibc-linuxthreads
    ... Thomas LangÄs wrote: ... You should drop that code like a hot potato. ... Internals change. ... If you desperately need this package you need to get the glibc source ...
    (Fedora)
  • Re: glibc 2.2 vs 2.3 issue back again
    ... >> libc.so.6 know and depend on each other's internals. ... can I compile or get some version of libc-2.3.x ... to install the whole libc in a specified directory. ... 'make check' to see how glibc runs its tests. ...
    (comp.os.linux.development.apps)
  • Re: Linux development API
    ... | Unless you're working deep inside the internals of glibc, ... | probably do not need to use the Linux API. ...
    (comp.os.linux.development.system)