Re: efficacy of Linux w/o swap
From: Kasper Dupont (kasperd_at_daimi.au.dk)
Date: 05/16/05
- Previous message: George: "Exporting and using symbols on Kernel 2.6.X"
- In reply to: phil-news-nospam_at_ipal.net: "efficacy of Linux w/o swap"
- Next in thread: phil-news-nospam_at_ipal.net: "Re: efficacy of Linux w/o swap"
- Reply: phil-news-nospam_at_ipal.net: "Re: efficacy of Linux w/o swap"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 21:10:11 +0200
phil-news-nospam@ipal.net wrote:
>
> When I was in tty1 and pressed Alt-F2
> to go to tty2, it would pause and not switch for quite some time, then
> evetually complete the switch. Worst case event took 2.5 minutes.
I don't recall ever seeing switches between
text terminals delayed unless I had disabled
the keyboard interrupt.
Did you notice any indication on whether the
kernel had actually processed the keypress?
-- Kasper Dupont -- der bruger for meget tid på usenet. Note to self: Don't try to allocate 256000 pages with GFP_KERNEL on x86.
- Previous message: George: "Exporting and using symbols on Kernel 2.6.X"
- In reply to: phil-news-nospam_at_ipal.net: "efficacy of Linux w/o swap"
- Next in thread: phil-news-nospam_at_ipal.net: "Re: efficacy of Linux w/o swap"
- Reply: phil-news-nospam_at_ipal.net: "Re: efficacy of Linux w/o swap"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|