Re: Atomic operations: Windows vs Linux
- From: zferentz@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: 5 Dec 2005 08:09:35 -0800
Hi everyone,
Thanks for your replies .
I dont wanna use mutexes because of their heavy overhead , i don't mind
about the trashing because i'm using this technique for VERY SHORT AND
FAST operations .
in windows, i got x6 performance using the InterlockedCompareExchange,
and i guess i hope that i'll get the same effect undef linux as well.
Because i'm much more familiar with windows (as you can see) - i
haven't tried the pthread_splinlock , so i guess that's my next move
thnx
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Atomic operations: Windows vs Linux
- From: David Schwartz
- Re: Atomic operations: Windows vs Linux
- From: zferentz
- Re: Atomic operations: Windows vs Linux
- Prev by Date: Re: Threads vs. Processes - the war goes on?
- Next by Date: Re: Atomic operations: Windows vs Linux
- Previous by thread: Re: Threads vs. Processes - the war goes on?
- Next by thread: Re: Atomic operations: Windows vs Linux
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|