Re: mmap behavior
- From: "David Schwartz" <davids@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 18 Sep 2006 16:23:22 -0700
ochedru@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
The following code behaves differently between kernel 2.4 and kernel
2.6:
size_t length = 0x40000000; /* 1GB */
void *addr = mmap (0, length, PROT_NONE, MAP_SHARED|MAP_ANONYMOUS, 0,
0);
Any advice?
I didn't see a question in there. Is this causing some kind of problem
for you?
DS
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: mmap behavior
- From: ochedru
- Re: mmap behavior
- References:
- mmap behavior
- From: ochedru
- mmap behavior
- Prev by Date: How to manage build process under autotools for kernel module
- Next by Date: Re: How to configure Linux kernel source tree hierarchy
- Previous by thread: mmap behavior
- Next by thread: Re: mmap behavior
- Index(es):